Quickly review your physical exam skills, and make evidence informed clinical decisions. All while earning CME Credit.

  • CME Credits icon

What is the evidence for Serotonin and Noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) for adults with fibromyalgia?

Summary

Patient Population:

18 studies, double blind RCTs, of 7903 participants with fibromyalgia.

Intervention:

SNRIs in these studies included duloxetine (8 studies), milnacipran (9 studies) and desvenlafaxine (1 study). Study duration ranged from short term/6-12 weeks (11 studies), medium term/13-26 weeks (5 studies) and long term/>26 weeks (2 studies).

Comparison:

Seven of the studies compared duloxetine against placebo, 9 studies compared milnacipran against placebo, one study compared desvenlafaxine with against placebo and pregabalin, and one study compared duloxetine with L-carnitine. Major outcomes of self-reported pain relief of >50%, improved patient global impression, tolerability, and safety were measured.

Outcome:

  • Self-reported pain relief of >50% occurred for 31% of the SNRI participants versus 21% of the placebo group (Risk Difference (RD) was 0.09 indicating no clinical benefit, 95% CI 0.07-0.11, 15 pooled studies)
  • 51% of the SNRI group reported a “very much” improved global impression compared to 29% of the placebo group (RD was 0.19 indicating a clinical benefit, 95% CI 0.12-0.26, 6 pooled studies)
  • 19% of the SNRI group dropped out due to adverse effects versus 10% of the placebo group (RD was 0.07 indicating no clinical difference, 95% CI 0.04-0.10, 15 pooled studied)
  • 8% of the SNRI group had a serious adverse event compared to 2.1% of the placebo group (RD was -0.00, 95% CI -0.01-0.00, 13 pooled studies)

Guideline Recommendations

Source Recommendation
CRA Supported (Level 1/Grade A)

Outcomes Assessed

  • Benefit
  • Harm
  • Inconclusive

Pain

Self report (> 50% reduction)

Global Impression

"Much" or "Very Much" Improved

Other

Tolerability

Safety

Relevant Clinical Info

Very low to low quality of evidence RCTs due to indirectness, selective non reporting and publication biases, as all the reviewed studies were sponsored by pharmaceutical companies.

Participant Information

the sample size was 7903

their were 18 studies used.

CME Information / Site Feedback

Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)

1. What is the impact of this information on you or your practice?

Note: Check all that apply. You may check more than one box.

 I learned something new I am motivated to learn more This information confirmed I did (am doing) the right thing I am reassured I am reminded of something I already knew I am dissatisfied There is a problem with the presentation of this information I disagree with the content of this information This information is potentially harmful

2. Is this information relevant for at least one of your patients?

 Totally relevant Partially relevant Not relevant

3. Will you use this information for a specific patient?

 Yes No Possibly I already know about this information, and I'm Already Using it.

4. Please rate the websites ease of use.

1 2 3 4 5 

5. Likelihood of using site again/recommending the site.

1 2 3 4 5 

Additional Information

×

Example AMSTAR Information

example amstar rating guidlines example amstar rating guidlines ×