Quickly review your physical exam skills, and make evidence informed clinical decisions. All while earning CME Credit.

  • CME Credits icon

What is the evidence for ACL injury prevention programs?

Summary

Patient Population:

Female athletes.  Reported mean ages ranged from 14 – 22 years.  Participants were involved in soccer, volleyball, basketball and handball.

Intervention:

Neuromuscular training designed to reduce incidence of ACL injury.  Interventions employed mixed strategies that included stretching, plyometrics, weight-training/strength training, balance exercises, cardiovascular training, agility training, sport-specific drills, basic warm-ups, jump training, core stability Duration of training sessions ranged from 10 minutes – 90 minutes.  Reported length of intervention was often based on the length of the competitive season (e.g. 12 weeks for soccer, 5 months for handball).  Overall interventions ranged from 6 weeks – 9 months in length.

Comparison:

Number of ACL injuries in control and intervention groups.

Outcome:

  1. The authors calculated a RRR for overall ACL injury of 0.438 (95% CI 0.289 to 0.555) for individuals assigned to treatment vs. control conditions.

  2. There was a significant reduction in risk for non-contact ACL injury associated with intervention (RRR= 0.734; 95% CI 0.625, 0.811) for treatment vs. control conditions.

  3. NNT for all ACL injuries = 120 athletes. NNT for non-contact ACL injuries = 108.

Guideline Recommendations

Source Recommendation
CASEM Support Use
AAOS Moderate evidence to support

Outcomes Assessed

  • Benefit
  • Harm
  • Inconclusive

ACL Prevention Programs

Non-contact ACL Injuries

Contact ACL Injuries

CME Information / Site Feedback

Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)

1. What is the impact of this information on you or your practice?

Note: Check all that apply. You may check more than one box.

 I learned something new I am motivated to learn more This information confirmed I did (am doing) the right thing I am reassured I am reminded of something I already knew I am dissatisfied There is a problem with the presentation of this information I disagree with the content of this information This information is potentially harmful

2. Is this information relevant for at least one of your patients?

 Totally relevant Partially relevant Not relevant

3. Will you use this information for a specific patient?

 Yes No Possibly I already know about this information, and I'm Already Using it.

4. Please rate the websites ease of use.

1 2 3 4 5 

5. Likelihood of using site again/recommending the site.

1 2 3 4 5 

Additional Information

×

Example AMSTAR Information

example amstar rating guidlines example amstar rating guidlines ×