Quickly review your physical exam skills, and make evidence informed clinical decisions. All while earning CME Credit.

  • CME Credits icon

What is the evidence for oral and transdermal opioids in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee?

Summary

Patient Population:

Patients studied were diagnosed with either hip or knee OA.

Intervention:

Transdermal fentanyl was studied in 1 trial.  The remainder of trials examined the use of various oral opioids (morphine = 1, oxycodone=4, oxymorphone=4).

Comparison:

10 trials were selected for inclusion in the review.  All trials were described as double-blind studies.  However, poor reporting quality was noted as responsible for inability to ascertain whether concealed allocation had been adequately carried out in most cases.  7/10 trials reported using ITT analysis, but the review authors did not consider this to have been the case for the primary outcome of pain and function.  In terms of adverse events, the quality of evidence was considered to be moderate to low due to the low number of trials reporting outcomes, and low numbers of events reported.

Outcome:

  1. Pain: fentanyl patch vs. placebo (1 study) – significant difference in favour of the patch (SMD = -0.22; 95% CI, -0.42 to -0.03).
  2. Pain: opioids vs. placebo (10 studies) – significant difference in favour of opioids (SMD = -0.36; 95% CI  -0.47 to -0.26; NNT = 8).
  3. Function: fentanyl patch vs. placebo (1 study) – significant difference in favour of the patch (SMD=-0.28; 95% CI -0.48 to -0.09).
  4. Function: opioids vs. placebo (10 studies) – significant difference in favour of opioids (SMD=-0.33; 95% CI -0.45 to -0.21).A
  5. Safety: There was a significant increase in risk for adverse events associated with allocation to the fentanyl patch group (RR=1.55; 95% CI 1.33 to 1.81).
  6. Safety: There was a significant increase in risk for adverse events associated with allocation to an opioid treatment condition (RR=1.55; 95% CI 1.41 to 1.7; NNH= 12).

Guideline Recommendations

Source Recommendation
ACR (2019) Tramadol Conditionally recommended
ACR (2019) Non-tramadol Opioids Conditionally against
AAOS (2013) Tramadol Strong evidence for use
AAOS (2013) Non-tramadol Opioids Inconclusive

Outcomes Assessed

  • Benefit
  • Harm
  • Inconclusive

Fentanyl Patch

Pain

Function

Safety

Oral Opioids

Pain

Function

Safety

CME Information / Site Feedback

Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)

1. What is the impact of this information on you or your practice?

Note: Check all that apply. You may check more than one box.

 I learned something new I am motivated to learn more This information confirmed I did (am doing) the right thing I am reassured I am reminded of something I already knew I am dissatisfied There is a problem with the presentation of this information I disagree with the content of this information This information is potentially harmful

2. Is this information relevant for at least one of your patients?

 Totally relevant Partially relevant Not relevant

3. Will you use this information for a specific patient?

 Yes No Possibly I already know about this information, and I'm Already Using it.

4. Please rate the websites ease of use.

1 2 3 4 5 

5. Likelihood of using site again/recommending the site.

1 2 3 4 5 

Additional Information

×

Example AMSTAR Information

example amstar rating guidlines example amstar rating guidlines ×