Quickly review your physical exam skills, and make evidence informed clinical decisions. All while earning CME Credit.

  • CME Credits icon

What is the evidence for therapeutic exercise in the treatment of rotator cuff pathology?

Summary

Patient Population:

All patients participating in studies were symptomatic. Reported age ranged from a mean of 47.6 to 55.6 (though age was not always reported). Sample composition ranged from 77% female to 100% male. The type of information reported regarding patient samples varied widely and basic patient descriptors appear inconsistently reported.

Intervention:

Supervised exercise or home exercise programs. Supervised exercise: defined as exercise undertaken with regular contact over the duration of the intervention. Home exercise: defined as a program of exercise undertaken without regular contact with a healthcare professional. The content of the programs tended to include stretching and progressive resistance exercises using equipment such as Therabands, but overall, programs were general heterogeneous. Duration of treatment varied, but appear to be 8-12 weeks.

Comparison:

Comparison conditions varied and included the following: no intervention, placebo, surgery, functional brace, multimodal physiotherapy. 5 articles, describing 4 studies were included in the review.

Outcome:

  1. Pain: supervised exercise vs. placebo (1 RCT) –  reduction in pain over short-term.
  2. Function: supervised exercise vs. placebo (1 RCT) –  improvement in function over short-term.
  3. Pain: supervised exercise vs. surgery (1 CT) – no significant difference over short, medium or long term.
  4. Function: supervised exercise vs. surgery (1 CT) – no significant difference over short, medium or long term.
  5. Pain: home exercise vs. no intervention (1 RCT) – reduction in pain over short-term.
  6. Function: home exercise vs. no intervention (1 RCT) – improvement in function over the short-term.
  7. Function: home exercise vs. functional brace (1 RCT) – no significant difference.

Guideline Recommendations

Source Recommendation
AAOS 2010 - full thickness tear Inconclusive
AAOS 2010 - in the absence of full thickness tear Moderate
AOTA 2009 Level C
ACOEM 2011 Level C

Outcomes Assessed

  • Benefit
  • Harm
  • Inconclusive

Supervised Exercise vs. Placebo

Pain

Function

Supervised Exercise vs. Surgery

Pain

Function

Home Exercise vs. No Intervention

Pain

Function

Home Exercise vs. Functional Brace

Function

CME Information / Site Feedback

Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)

1. What is the impact of this information on you or your practice?

Note: Check all that apply. You may check more than one box.

 I learned something new I am motivated to learn more This information confirmed I did (am doing) the right thing I am reassured I am reminded of something I already knew I am dissatisfied There is a problem with the presentation of this information I disagree with the content of this information This information is potentially harmful

2. Is this information relevant for at least one of your patients?

 Totally relevant Partially relevant Not relevant

3. Will you use this information for a specific patient?

 Yes No Possibly I already know about this information, and I'm Already Using it.

4. Please rate the websites ease of use.

1 2 3 4 5 

5. Likelihood of using site again/recommending the site.

1 2 3 4 5 

Additional Information

×

Example AMSTAR Information

example amstar rating guidlines example amstar rating guidlines ×